Chat is set up on each filing report page.
Ask about this filing, its industry, or sector trends.
AI responses are generated from filing and peer context and may contain errors.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent in our business. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that are currently deemed to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, capital levels, cash flows, liquidity, results of operations and prospects. The market price of our common stock could decline significantly due to any identified or other risks, and some or all of your investment value could diminish. The risks discussed below include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. This Form 10-K is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.
Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions
Our business may be adversely affected by downturns in the national economy and the regional economies in which we operate.
We provide banking and financial services primarily to businesses and individuals in the states of California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Washington. All our branches and most of our deposit clients are located in these five states. A return of recessionary conditions or addverse economic conditions in theour markets we serve may reduce our rate of areas could impact our growth, affect rate, reduce our customers ability to repay loans, and adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, because a high concentration of our client base is in the San Francisco Bay area, the deterioration of businesses in this market, or one or more businesses with a large employee base in this market, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. General economic conditions, including inBroader economic factors such as inflation, unemployment and money supply fluctuations, also may adversely affect our profitability. WeakneFurther, trade
28
warss i, tariffs, or shifts in the global economy arade policies between the United States and global supother nations could disrupt supply chain issues have adversely affected manys, increase costs for businesses operating in our markets that are dependent upon international trade. Changes in agree, and reduce export opportunities for our customers. These developments or rel may, in turn, negationships betweenvely impact the United Statese businesses and other countries may further affect these businesses, by extension, our operations and financial performance. In addition, adverse weather conditions as well as decreases in market prices for agricultural products grown in our markets can adversely affect agricultural businesses in our markets.
A downturn in economic conditions in the market areas we serve, in particular the San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California, Denver, Colorado, Seattle, Washington, Central New Mexico and the agricultural region of the California Central Valley, whetherbe it due to inflation, recessionary trends, geopolitical conflicts, adverse weather, or other factors, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, including but not limited to:
|
| Reduced demand for our products and services, potentially leading to a decline in our overall loans or assets. |
|
| Elevated levels of loan delinquencies, problem |
|
| An increase in our allowance for credit losses on loans. |
|
| Depreciation in collateral values linked to our loans, thereby diminishing borrowing capacities and asset values tied to existing loans. |
|
| Reduced net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors, possibly impairing their ability to meet commitments to us. |
|
| Reduction in our low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits. |
A decline in local or regional economic conditions may have a greater effect on our earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital ofcompared to larger financial institutions whoith more geographically diverse real estate loan portfolios are geographically diverse. Many. Because a significant portion of theour loans in our portfolio areis secured by real estate or fixtures attached to real estate. Any, deterioration in the real estate markets associated with the collateral securing mortgage loans could significantly icould impactir borrowers' repayment capa abilitiey to repay loans and reduce the value of the underlying collateral. Real estate values are affectinfluenced by various othera range of factors, including economic conditions, regulatory changgovernment policies, and nnatural disasters such as(e.g., earthquakes, floods, firesing and tornadoes), and mudslides. If we are required to litrade-related pressures affecting construction costs or material availability. Liquidate a ing significant amount of collateral during a period of reducdepressed real estate values, could negatively impact our financial condition and profitability could be adversely affected.
31
External economic factors, such as changes in m.
Monetary policy and , inflation and , deflation, may have an adand other external economic factors could adverse effely impact on our business, financial conditionperformance and results of ooperations.
Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Inflation has risen sharply since the end of 2021 and throughout 2022 at levels not seen for over 40 years. IHigher U.S. tariffs on imported goods could exacerbate inflationary pressures, while by increasing recently, remained elevthe cost of goods and mated throughout the first half of 2023. Srials for businesses and consumers. This may particularly affect small to medium-sized businesses may be impacted more during periods of high inflation as t, as they are notless able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, the ability of oour business clients to repay their loans may deteriorate quickly, which woulmay experience increased financial strain, reducing their ability to repay loans and adversely impacting our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to the Company us to increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. A and, as a result, market interest rates tend to have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. IHowever, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or by the same mmagnitude as the prices of goods and services, creating additional uncertainty in the economic environment.
Risks Related to Our Lending Activities
Nonperforming assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and could result in further losses in the future.
Nonperforming assets adversely affect our earnings in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or foreclosed assets, and nonaccrual loans and foreclosed assets increase our loan administration costs. Upon foreclosure or similar proceedings, we record the repossessed asset at theits estimated fair value, less costs to sell, which may result in a write-down or loss. A significant increase in the level of nonperforming assets from current levels would also increase our risk profile and may impact the capital levels our regulators believe are appropriate in light of
29
the increased risk profile. While we attempt to reduce problem assets through collection efforts, asset sales and workouts and restructurings, decreases in the value of the underlying collateral, or in the borrowers performance or financial condition, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets can require significant commitments of time from management, diverting their attention from other aspects of our operations.
Many of our loans are to commercial borrowers, which have a higher degree of risk than other types of loans.
At December 31, 20234, we had $1.8 billion of commercial loans, consisting of $1.7 billion of commercial real estate and construction and land loans, representing 87.15.5% of total loans, and $16273.9 million of commercial and industrial loans, representing 8.49% of total loans, where real estate is not the primary source of collateral. The $1.7 billion of commercial real estate loans includes $249.5225.2 million of multifamily loans and $9.61.5 million of commercial construction and land loans.
Commercial loans typically involve highlarger principal amounts than other types of loans, withand some of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respectrelated to on a single loan or one credit relationship can expose us to s a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a oneone-to-four family residential mortgage loan. Because s. Repayments on such of commercial loans are often dependents on the cash flow of the commercial venture andgenerated by the succbusinessful operation or development of the p or property/business involved, repayment of such loans is oftenmaking them more sensitive than other types of loans to ao adverse conditions in the real estate market or the general , business climate and, or economy. Repayments ofFor loans secured by non-owner -occupied properties, repayments rely heavily on tenant rent payments, and any downturns in the real estate market or economic conditions heightens our repayment risks. In addition, many of our commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and require large balloon payments upon maturity. Su, which balloon payments may requiremay compel the borrower to either sell or refinance the underlying property in order to make the payment, which may i, increaseing the risk of default or nonpayment. Meanwhile, our co.
Commercial business loans are primariltypically made based on the cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. A borrowers cash flow may prove tocan be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most often, this collateral includes accounts receivable, inventory, equipment For real estate. In the case
32
lof loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the re repayment of these loans may be substantially is often dependent on the ability of the boborrower s ability to collect amounts due from its clients. Other collateral securing commercial business loans may depreci, while other forms of collate over time, mral may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid and may fluctuate in value based on the, or affected by business success of the business. An i. Increases in specific reserves and charge -offs related to our commercial and industrial loan portfolio could have a material adverse effely impact on our business, financial condition, results of ooperations, and future prospects.
In recent years, the commercial real estate markets have been es experiencinged substantial growth, andwith increased competitive pressures have on contributed significantlying to historically low capitalization rates and rising property values. FurHowever, ther, commercial real estate economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted this markets have been particularly impac. The pandemic also accelerated by the economic disruption resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has also been a catalyst for adoption of remote work, which has led many companies to re-evaluate their long-term real estate needs. While some businesses are returning to traditional office environments, othe evolution of various remote work options which rs are downsizing or shifting to hybrid models, creating uncertainty in demand for office spaces and other commercial properties. This trend could impact the result in prolong-term performed vacance of sies, declining rental income types of , and reduced properties withiny values, adversely affecting the performance of our commercial real estate loan portfolio. Accordingly, the f Federal banking regulatory agenciess also have expressraised concerns about weaknesses in the current commercial real estate market. Failures in our risk management policies, procedures and controls could adversely affect our abilitylead to manage this portfolio going forward and could result in an increased rate of higher delinquencies in, and increased losses from, this portfolio, which could have a material a, adverse ely affect oning our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Construction loans are based upon estimates of costs and values associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate, and we may be exposed to significant losses on loans for these projects.
Construction and land development loans totaled $9.61.5 million, or 0.51% of total loans as of December 31, 2023, 4, nearly all of which $1.6 million were commercial real estate construction loans and $8.0 million were residential real estate construction loans. .
These loans involve additional risks because funds are advanced based on the projects uncertain value prior to its completion, and costs may exceed realizable values in declining real estate markets. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs and the realizable market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, it is relatively difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. Higher than anticipated buildingconstruction costs may cause actual results to vary significantly from those estimated. Further, this type of lending often involves larger loan principal amounts and might be
30
concentrated among a limited number of builders. A downturn in the commercial real estate market could increase delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral, hindering our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. Dealing with bBuilders who have ith multiple loans with us exposes us to heheightened these risks where, as adverse developments in one credit relationship could substantiallyan increase our riskverall exposure. During the term of some of our construction loans, borrowers aredo not required to make payments, as accumulated interest is added to the principal through an interest reserve. ThereforeConsequently, repayment is contingent, in part,often depends on the project's success and the borrower's ability to sell or lease the property, rather than solely on the borrower's re repayment capacity. Overstating the completed pproject's value, a decline ining market valueconditions, or falling rental rate drops might leave us withs could result in insufficient security forcollateral to secure loan repayment post-construction. MonAdditionally, monitoring the building process involvrequires additional costs, including onon-site inspections and cost comparisons. , adding to administrative costs.
Properties under construction are oftengenerally difficult to sell and typicallyoften must be completed in order to be before a successfully soldl sale can occur, complicating the handlingmanagement of problem construction loans. If we foreclose on a defaulted construction loan prior to or at during or before project completion, we might not recover the entire unpaid balance, accrued interest, andor foreclosure and holding costs. Further, additional funding completing unfinished projects may be needed to complete the project require additional funding, and we may haveneed to hold the propertyies for an unspecifiextended period of time while we attempt to s before disposeing of itthem.
Our construction loans include those with a salesspeculative contract or permanentstruction loan in place for the finishsprojects without identified homes and those for which end-purchasers for the finished homes may not be identified either during or following the construction period, known as speculative construction loans. Speculative construction loans pose additional risks, especially regarding finding end-purchasers for finished projectwhich pose heightened risks due to market uncertainties. We also offerprovide loans onfor land under development or held for future construction. These loans carry additional risks due to , including longer development periodtimelines, vulnerabilityexposure to real estate value declines, economic fluctuations delaying projects, political changes affecting land use, and the collateral's illiquid nature. During thisese extended financing-to-completion peperiods, the collateral oftentypically generates no cash flow.
33
Our business may be adversely affected by credit risk associated with residential property.
At December 31, 20234, $86.0109.7 million, or 4.55.6% of total loans, was secured by first liens on one-to-four family residential real estate. In addition, at December 31, 20234, our home equity loans and lines of credit totaled $5.91 million. A portion of our one-to-four family residential real estate loan portfolio consists of jumbo loans that do not conform to secondary market mortgage requirements, and therefore are not immediately sellab, which exceed the maximum balance allowed for sale to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac because such loans exceeand the maximum balance allowable for sale. Jumbo one-to-four family residential refore cannot be sold to these government-sponsored enterprises. These jumbo loans may expose us to carry increased risk because ofdue to their larger balances and because they cannot be immediately sold to government sponsored enterprises.
limited liquidity. In addition, one-to-four family residential loans are generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impaaffect the ability of boborrowers tability to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. A decline in residential real estate values resulting from a doownturn in the housing market in our market areaareas may reduce the value of the real estate collateral securing these types of loans and, increase ouring the risk of loss in the event of borrowers default on their loans. Recessionary conditions or , declines in the volume ofreased real estate sales and/or the salvolumes or prices coupled with , and elevated unemployment rates may result incould lead to higher than expected loan ddelinquencies or, problem assets, and a decline inreduced demand for our products and services. These potential negative events may cause us toadverse conditions could result incur losses and adversenegatively affeimpact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Agricultural lending and volatility in government regulations may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
At December 31, 20234, agricultural loans, including agricultural real estate and operating loans, were $15.32.0 million, or 0.861% of total loans. Agricultural lending involves a greater degree of risk and typically involves higher principal amounts than other types of loans. Repayment is dependent upon the successful operation of the business, which is greatly dependent on many things outside the control of either us or the borrowers. These factors include adverse weather conditions that prevent the planting of a crops or limit crop yields (such as hail, drought and floods), loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products (both domestically and internationally) and the impact of government regulations (including changes in price supports, subsidies, tariffs and environmental regulations). In addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may significantly affect the successful operation of the farm. If the cash flow from a farming operation is diminished, the borrowers ability to repay the loan may be impaired and the Bank may be unable to collect all principal and interest contractually due. Consequently, agricultural loans may involve a greater degree of risk than other types of loans, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as farm equipment (some of which is highly specialized with a limited or no market for resale), or assets such as livestock or crops. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted agricultural operating loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of
31
the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation or because the assessed value of the collateral exceeds the eventual realization value.
The success of our SBA lending program is dependent upon the continued availability of SBA loan programs, our status as a preferred lender under the SBA loan programs and our ability to comply with applicable SBA lending requirements.
As an SBA Preferred Lender, we enable our clients to obtain streamline the SBA loans without being subject to process for clients by bypassing the potentially llengthy SBA approval process necessary for lenders that aredures required for not SBA n-Preferred Lenders. The SBA periodically reviews the lending operations of paparticipating lenders to assess, among other things, whether the lender exhibits prudentevaluate risk management. When weakness practices. If deficiencies are identified, the SBA may request corrective actions or , impose other rrestrictions, includingor revocation of the ke a lenders Preferred Lender status. If we lose ourLosing this status as a Preferred Lender, we may be unablecould impair our ability to compete effectively with other SBA Preferred Lenders, which could have a and material adverse elly affect on our financial results.
Any Additionally, changes to the SBA program, including changes to the level of guaranty provided by the such as adjustments to federal government on SBA loans or changes to theuaranty level ofs or funds appropriated by the federal government to the various SBA programing allocations, may also have an acould adverse effely impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
34
Historically, we have sold the guaranteed portion of our SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market. These sales have resulted in gains or premiums on the sale of the loans and have created a stream of future servicing income. For the year ended December 31, 20234, we sold a total of $72.2 million in SBA loans (guaranteed portion) for a net gain of $508199,000. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue originating these loans, that a secondary market will continue to exist, or that we will continue to realize premiums upon the sale of the guaranteed portion of these loanon future sales. When we sSelling the guaranteed portion of our SBA 7(a) loans, we incur also exposes us to credit risk on the retained, non-guaranteed portion of the loans.
In order for a borrower to be eligible to receive.
To qualify for an SBA loan, the lenda borrower must establish that the borrower would not be abledemonstrate an inability to secure a bank loan without the credit enhconventional financements provided by a guaranty under ing without the SBA programguaranty. Accordingly, the SBA loans in our portfolio generallyoften have weaker credit characteristics than the rest of our portfolio, and may be at greater compared to other loans, increasing the risk of default in the event of deterioration induring economic conditiodownturns or the borrowers financial conditiondistress. In the event of a loss resulting from an defaults and a the SBA determination byes the SBA that there were is a deficiency in the manner ies in whichhow the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by us, the SBA may require us to repurchase the previously sold portion of the loan, denydeny or reduce its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty,quire us to repurchase the sold portion, or seek recovery of the principal loss related to the deficiency from us. Management hases. We have established a recourse reserve to cover estimated losses inherent inon the outstanding guaranteed portion of SBA loans and recorded a recourse reserve at a level determined to be appropriate. Significant increases to the recourseis reserve may materially decreasecould reduce our net income, which may and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
To meet our growth objectives, we may originate or purchase loans outside of our market areas, which could affect the level of our net interest margin and nonperforming loans.
To achieve our desired loan portfolio growth, we have sought and may continue seeking opportunities to originate or purchase loans outside of our market area, whether individually, through participations, or in bulk or pools. Prior to purchase, we perform certain due diligence procedures and may re-underwrite these loans to our underwriting standards. Although we anticipate acquiring loans with customary limited indemnities, this approach exposes us to heightened risks, particularly when acquiring loans in unfamiliar geographic areas or of a type where our management lacks substantial prior experience. Monitoring such loans also may pose greater challenges for us. Further, when determining the purchase price for these loans, management will make certain assumptions about, among other things, whether and when borrowers will prepay their loans, real estate market conditions, and our ability to successfully manage loan collections and, if necessary, dispose of acquired real estate through foreclosure.
To the extent that our underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or undergo unexpected changes, such as an unanticipated decline in the real estate market, the purchase price paid these loans could exceed the actual value, resulting in a lower yield or a loss of some or all of the loan principal. For instance, purchasing loan "pools" at a premium and experiencing earlier-than-expected loan prepayments would yield lower interest income than initially projected. Our success in growing our loan portfolio through loan purchases depends on our ability to price the loans properly and relies on the economic conditions in the geographic areas where the underlying properties or collateral for the acquired loans are located. Inaccurate estimates or declines in economic conditions or real estate values in the markets where we purchase loans could significantly adversely affect the level of our nonperforming loans and our results of operations.
32
Our allowance for credit losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio.
As with most financial institutions, we maintain an allowance for credit losses on loans to reserve for estimated potential losses on loans from defaults, which represents management's best estimate of expected credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses on loans involves estimating future losses at the time a loan is originated or acquired, incorporating a broad range of information and potential future economic scenarios. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses on loans inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses on loans, we review loans and our historical loss and delinquency experience and evaluate economic conditions. Management also recognizes that significant new growth in loan portfolios, new loan products, and the refinancing of existing loans can result in
35
portfolios comprised of unseasoned loans that may not perform consistently with a historical or projected manner and will increase the risk that our allowance for credit losses on loans may be insufficient to absorb credit losses without significant additional provisions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for credit losses on loans may not be sufficient to cover actual losses, requiring additional provisions for credit losses on loans to replenish the allowance for credit losses on loans. Deterioration in economic conditions, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans or relationships, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may increase our loan charge-offs and/or otherwise require an increase in our provision for credit losses on loans.
In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for credit losses on loans. Based on their assessment, they and may require increased provisions or loan charge-offs. Any increase in the provision for credit losses on loans negatively affects net income and could materially impact our financial condition, results of operations, and capital.
Risks Related to Market and Interest Rate Changes
Our profitability is vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations. Our earnings and cash flows are largeWildfires present significant risks to our loan portfolio and the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses.
While the recent wildfires in Southern California that began in January 2025 do not appear to have directly dependent upon oimpacted our net interestborrowers income. Interest r any mates are highly sensitive to many factors that arial respects, future beyond our control, including generwildfires could lead to heightened financial economic conditions and policies of various governdistress. Borrowers affected by these fires may experience financial hardship, which could decrease their repaymental capacity and regulatory agencies, and particularly the Federal Reserve. Dincrease the likelihood of loan defaults.
Damage to or destruction of properties securing 2023, in responseloans could lead to continueda depreciation inf collationary pressureral values, furthe Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)r increasing the risk of the Federpotential Reserve Boardlosses. In addition, increased the target ranadequate insurance coverage for the federal funds rate 100 basis pointsdenied claims may hinder recovery efforts and add uncertainty to our ability to a range of 5.25% to 5.50%. A sustained and substantial change in market inccurately estimate credit losses. Local economic disruptions, including business closures and job losses caused by these disasterest rates could significantly impact ous, may also affect borrowers' ability to meet their financial condiobligation, liquidity, and resuls, necessitating adjustments of operato our credit loss assumptions. Furthermore, fluctuatio
Our concentration of loans in interest ratwildfire-prone areas further amplifies could adversely affectour exposure, and the valuation of our assetsgrowing frequency and liabilities, ultimately affecting our earnings.
We principally manage inintensity of wildfires heightens our long-terest ratem credit risk bys. This managing the volume and mix of our earning ay require increases to our allowance for credit lossets ands in funding liabilities. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influencture periods. While we continue to assess and adjust our allowance to reflect current and anticipated risks, there can be not only th guarantee interest we recet will fully cover actual losses, especially give on loans and investmentn the ongoing uncertainties and the amount of interest we pay challenges associated with wildfires.
In addition deposits and borrowings, but coulto the lending-related risks discussed also affect (i)bove, many of our ability to originoffices are located, and/or sell loans and obta many of our employees reside, in deposits, (ii) the fair valuewildfire-prone areas. Damage to or destruction of our financial assets and liabilities, which coffices and/or our employees homes caused by wildfires could negatively impact shareholders equity,be materially disruptive to our operations.
Risks Related to Market and oInterest Rate Changes
Our profitability to realize gains from the sale of such assets, (iii) our ability to obtain and retain depositsis vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations.
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest in competition with other availablee, which is significantly affected by investment alternaterest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitives, (iv) the ability of to factors beyond our borrowers to repay adjustable or variable rate loancontrol, such as general economic conditions and policies set by governmental and regulatory bodies, and (v) particularly the average duFederal Reserve. Increases in interest ration ofes could
33
reduce our investment senet interest income, weaken the housing market by curities portfoliobing refinancing activity and home purchases, and other interest-earning assets. In a changingnegatively affect the broader U.S. economy, potentially leading to slower economic growth or recessionary conditions.
We principally manage interest rate environment, we may not be able to manage this risk effectivelyrisk by managing our volume and mix of our earning assets and funding liabilities. If we are unable to manage interest ratethis risk effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected.
A sustained increase in market Our net interest margin, the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest rates could-bearing liabilities, can be adversely affect our earninged by interest rate changes. A significant porWhile yields on assets and costs of liabilities tend to move in the same direction of our loans have fixed , they may do so at different speeds, causing the margin to expand or contract. As our interest rates and longer -bearing liabilities often have shorterm durations than our deposits and borrowinterest-earning assets, a rise in interest rates may lead to fundings.
As is costs increasing faster the case withan asset yields, compressing our net interest many banks, we attempt to increase our proportrgin. Additionally, changes in the slope of the yield curve, such as flattening or inversion of deposits compris, can further pressure our margins as funding either no orcosts rise relatively low-interest-bear to asset yields. Conversely, falling accourates can increase loan prepayments, which has been challengleading to reinvestment in lower-yielding assets, reducing over the last couple of yearsincome.
In a rising rate environment, retaining deposits can become costlier. At December 31, 20234, our deposit composition included $372.4485.2 million in certificates of deposit maturing within one year and $1.7 billion in noninterest-bearing, NOW checking, savings, and money market accounts. We woulIf deposit and borrowing rates rise faster than loan and incvestment yields, our a higher cost of funds to retain these depositsnet interest income and overall earnings could decline.
A substantial amount of our loans have adjustable interest rates, which may result in a higher incidence of default in a rising interest rate environment. OAdditionally, a significant portion of our netadjustable-rate loans include interest income couldrate floors that prevent the loans contractual interest rate from falling be adverslow a specified level. At December 31, 2024, approximately affec$1.3 billion, or 67.4% of our loan portfolio consisted if the rates we pay on deposits and borrowings of adjustable or floating-rate loans, and approximately $992.5 million, or 75.4%, of those adjustable or floating-rate loans contained interest rate floors. The presence of interest rate floors can increase more rapidly than theincome during periods of declining interest rates we earn, as the rates on these loans and ocannot adjust downward below ther investments.
Although management believes it has implemented effective asset and liability management strategies to reduce the potential effects floor. However, this benefit is subject to the risk that borrowers may refinance these loans to take advantage of lower rates. Furthermore, when loans are at their floor interest rates, our interest income may not rise as quickly as our cost of changes infunds during periods of increasing interest rates on , which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, any substantial.
While we employ asset and liability management strategies to mitigate interest rate risk, unexpected , substantial, or prolonged change in market interest rat rate changes could have a material adverse ely affect on our financial condition and results of operations. Alsodditionally, our interest rate risk modeling techniques and assumptions likely will may not fully predict or ccapture the impact of actual interest rrate changes on our balance sheet or projected operating results. For further discussion of how changes in interest rates could impact us, see See Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk, of this Form 10-K for a discussion of interest rate risk modeling and the inherent risks in modeling assumptions.
36
We may incur losses on our securities portfolio as a result of increases in interest rates.
Factors beyond our control can significantly inOur securities portfolio may be impacted by fluence the fair value of securitiectuations in our portfolio and can causemarket value, potential adverse changes to lly reducing accumulated othe fair value of these securitier comprehensive income and/or earnings. These factors include, but are not limited toluctuations may result from changes in market interest rates, rating agency actions in respect of the securities,, issuer defaults by, or other adverse events affecting, the issuer, issues with underlying securities, lower market prices, or with respect to the underlyinglimited investor demand. Our available-for-sale debt securities, and changes in market interest rates and continued in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine whether the decline instability in the capital markets. Any of fair value has resulted from credit losses or otheser factors, among others, could cause other-than-temporary impairments. If a credit loss is identified, and realized and/ allowance for unrealizedcredit losses in future periods and decliness recorded, resulting in other comprehensive income, which could have a material effect on our business, financial condition and a charge against earnings. Because available-for-sale securities are reported at estimated fair value, changes in interesults of opet rations. The process for determining whether impes can adversely affect our financial condition. The fairment value of afixed-rate security is other-than-temporary usuaies generally requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performancemoves inversely with interest rate changes. Unrealized gains and liquidity ofosses on the issuer anse securities are reported any collateral underlying the security to ass a separate component of AOCI, net of tax.
Decreasess in the probabilityfair value of receiving all contractual prsecurities available-for-sale resulting from incipal andreases in interest payments on the securrates could have an adverse effect on shareholders equity. TAdditionally, there can be is no assurance that the declines in market value will not result in other-than-temporary impairments of these assets ancredit losses, which would lead to accounting chargdditional provisions for credit losses that could have a material adverse elly affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we did not incur any other-than-temporary impairments on our securities portfolio.
net income and capital levels.
34
Risks Related to our Merger and Acquisition Strategy
Our strategy of pursuing acquisitions exposes us to financial, execution, compliance and operational risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
A substantial part of our historical growth has been a result of acquisitions of other financial institutions, a strategy we plan to continue by evaluating and selectively acquiring entities that align with our client base and desired markets. However, the acquisition market is fiercely competitive, and we may encounter challenges in identifying suitable candidates that meet our acquisition standards and strategy. Our ability to compete relies on our financial resources, including cash reserves, liquidity, and the market price of our common stock. Increased competition may also drive up acquisition costs, which fluctuate with market conditions. There have been instances in the past where we were unable to secure acquisitions at acceptable prices, and we anticipate similar challenges in the future. Furthermore, identifying attractive acquisition opportunities often involves meeting various conditions, such as obtaining regulatory approvals, a process that can be burdensome, time-consuming and unpredictable. Sustaining our historical growth rate may be difficult if we are unable to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets. We have completed ten full bank acquisitions since 2010, which has enhanced our growth rate over the years.
Our pursuit of acquisitions may disrupt our business, and any equity that we issue as merger consideration may have the effect of diluting the value of your investment in the Company. Our acquisition activities strategy involves a number of significant risks, including:
|
| Diverting management attention and resources toward identifying, evaluating, and negotiating potential acquisitions, potentially detracting from our existing business operations. |
|
| Reliance on estimates and judgments, which could be inaccurate, in evaluating credit, operational, management, and market risks of the target company or the assets and liabilities we aim to acquire. |
|
| Exposure to potential asset quality and credit risks. |
|
| Higher than expected deposit attrition; |
|
| Potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities from acquired banks and businesses, including regulatory and compliance issues. |
|
| The risk of not realizing expected revenue increases, cost savings, geographic or product expansions, or other projected acquisition benefits. |
|
| Costs and time required to integrate operations and personnel from the combined businesses. |
|
| Inconsistencies in standards, procedures, and policies that may adversely affect client and employee relationships; |
|
| Potential increase in operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations. |
|
| Short-term adverse effects on our financial results, such as increases in general and administrative expenses initially, which potentially adversely affects our efficiency ratio. |
|
| Challenges related to the conversion and integration of financial and client data. |
37
|
| Borrowing funds or alternative financing methods, such as issuing common or convertible preferred stock, that may increase leverage, diminish liquidity, and result in dilution for existing shareholders. |
|
| Risks of impairment to goodwill, which would require a charge to earnings. |
Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Any expansion into new markets or new lines of business might not be successful.
As part of our strategic plan, we may consider expansion into new geographic markets. Such expansion might take the form of de novo branches or the acquisition of existing banks or branches. There are substantial risks associated with such efforts, including risks that (i) revenues from such activities might not be sufficient to offset the development, compliance, and other implementation costs, (ii) competing products and services and shifting market preferences might affect the profitability of such activities, and (iii) our internal controls might be inadequate to manage the risks associated with new activities. Furthermore, our unfamiliarity with new markets or lines of business might adversely affect the success of such actions. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also affect the ultimate implementation of a new line of business or offerings of new products, product
35
enhancements or services. If any such expansions into new geographic or product markets are not successful, there could be an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Accounting Matters
We may experience future goodwill impairment, which could reduce our earnings.
We performed our test for goodwill impairment at December 31, 20234 and the test concluded that recorded goodwill was not impaired. Our test of goodwill for potential impairment is based on a qualitative assessment by management that takes into consideration macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost or margin factors, financial performance and share price. Our evaluation of the fair value of goodwill involves a substantial amount of judgment. If our judgment were incorrect, or if events or circumstances change, and an impairment of goodwill was deemed to exist, we would be required to write down our goodwill, resulting in a charge against operations, which may materially adversely affect our results of operations.
The CompanysOur reported financial results depend on managements selection of accounting methods and certain assumptions and estimates, which, if incorrect, could cause unexpected losses in the future.
The Companys aOur accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how the Company we records and reports its our financial condition and results of operations. The Companys manaManagement must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods so that they comply with generally accepted accounting principles and reflect managements judgment regarding the most appropriate manner to report the Companyst our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances, yet might result in the Companyus reporting materially different results than would have been reported under a different alternative.
Certain accounting policies, most notably the allowance for credit losses, are critical to presenting the Companysour financial condition and results of operations. They require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions or estimates. For more information, refer to Critical Accounting Estimates included in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-K.
We are subject to an extensive body of accounting rules and best practices. Periodic changes to such rules may change the treatment and recognition of critical financial line items and affect our profitability.
Our business operations are significantly influenced by the extensive body of accounting regulations in the United States. Regulatory bodies periodicalregularly issue new guidance, altering accounting rules and reporting requirements, which
38
can substantially affect the preparation and reportingpresentation of our financial statements. These changes might necessitatay require retrospective application, potentially leading to restatements of prior period financial statements.
One such significant change from 2022 was impacting our operations is the implementation of the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) model, which we adopted on January 1, 2023. Under the CECL model, financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, are presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This forward-looking approach in estimatinges expected credit losses contrasts starkly with the former GAAP's "incurred loss" model, delaying recognition until a loss is probable. CECL mandates consideby considering historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts affecting collectability, leading to periodic adjustments of financial a. The model contrasts with the previous "incurred loss" methodology under GAAP, which recognized losset values. However,s only when they were probable. While CECL improves this forward-looke timeliness of recognizing methodology,credit losses, its reliantce on macroeconomic variables,forecasts introduces the potential for increased earnings volatility due to unexpected changes in theseeconomic indicators between periods. An additional consequence of lly, CECL icreates an accounting asymmetry between: loan-related income, is recognized periodically based onusing the effective interest method, anwhile expected credit losses, are recognized upfront at origination. This asymmetry might creatay give the perceptimpression of reduced profitability during loan expansion periods periods of loan growth due to the immediate recognition of expected credit losses. Conversely, periods with stable or declining loan le, and relativels my hight seem relatively more er profitable as income accrues gradually for loans where losses had been previously recognized.
As a result ility during periods of the change in methodology from the incurred loss method to the CECL model, on January 1, 2023, the Company recognized an increase in the allowance for credit loss on loans totaling $1.5 million and an increase to the allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments of $45,000, as a cumulative effect adjustment from change in accounting policies,stable or declining loan volumes, as income continues to accrue for loans with a corresponding after-tax decrease to opening retain previously recognized earnings of $491,000. losses.
Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Third Parties and Technology
36
We are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology.
Our security measures may not be sufficient to mitigate the risk of a cyber-attack. Communications and information systems are essential to the conduct of our business, as we use such systems to manage our client relationships, our general ledger, and virtually all other aspects of our business. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, the security of our computer systems, software, and networks may be vulnerable to breaches, fraudulent or unauthorized access, denial or degradation of service, attacks, misuse, computer viruses, malware, or other malicious code and cyber-attacks that could have a security impact. If one or more of these events occur, this could jeopardize our or our clients confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our clients or counterparties. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us.
Security breaches in our internet banking activities could further expose us to possible liability and damage our reputation. Increases in criminal activity levels and sophistication, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries, vulnerabilities in third party technologies (including browsers and operating systems), or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that we use to prevent fraudulent transactions, and to protect data about us, our clients, and underlying transactions. Any compromise of our security could deter clients from using our internet banking services that involve the transmission of confidential information. Although we have developed and continue to invest in systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyber-attacks and periodically test our security, these precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of our security measures, and could result in losses to us or our clients, our loss of business and/or clients, damage to our reputation, the incurrence of additional expenses, disruption to our business, our inability to grow our online services, or other businesses, additional regulatory scrutiny or penalties, or our exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our security measures may not protect us from system failures or interruptions. We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of system breaches, failures and interruptions. In addition, we outsource certain aspects of our data processing and other operational functions to certain third-party providers. While we select third-party
39
vendors carefully, we do not control their actions. If our third-party providers encounter difficulties, including those resulting from breakdowns or other disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher transaction volumes, cyber-attacks or security breaches or if we otherwise have difficulty in communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and our ability to deliver products and services to our clients and otherwise conduct business operations could be adversely impacted. Replacing these third-party vendors could also entail significant delay and expense. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of client information through various other vendors and their personnel. We cannot assure you that such breaches, failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed by us or the third parties on which we rely.
Further, while we believe we maintain adequate insurance to cover these risks, our insurance coverage may not cover all losses resulting from breaches, system failures or other disruptions. The occurrence of any systems failure or interruption could damage our reputation and result in a loss of clients and business, could subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to legal liability. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our current and future uses of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies may create additional risks.
The increasing adoption of AI in financial services presents significant opportunities but also introduces a range of risks that could impact our operations, regulatory compliance, and customer trust. AI introduces model risk, where flawed algorithms or biased data could result in inaccurate credit decisions, compliance violations, or discriminatory outcomes in lending or customer service. Cybersecurity threats, such as data breaches, adversarial attacks, and data
37
poisoning, pose significant challenges, particularly as these systems handle large volumes of sensitive customer information. Additionally, the opaque nature of some AI models, often referred to as "black-box" systems, raises regulatory compliance concerns, as regulators increasingly require transparency and explainability in AI-driven decision-making.
Operational risks also arise from potential system failures, over-reliance on AI, and integration challenges with existing infrastructure. Disruptions in AI systems could impact critical functions such as fraud detection, transaction monitoring, and customer support. Ethical and reputational risks, including unintended consequences or perceived unfairness in AI-driven decisions, may erode customer trust and expose us to regulatory scrutiny.
Mitigating these risks requires a robust governance framework, regularly testing and auditing of AI models, and strong human oversight. Investments in cybersecurity, data privacy protections, and employee training are critical to managing these risks.
We are subject to certain risks in connection with our data management or aggregation.
We are reliant on our ability to manage data and our ability to aggregate data in an accurate and timely manner to ensure effective risk reporting and management. Our ability to manage data and aggregate data may be limited by the effectiveness of our policies, programs, processes and practices that govern how data is acquired, validated, stored, protected and processed. While we continuously update our policies, programs, processes and practices, many of our data management and aggregation processes are manual and subject to human error or system failure. Failure to manage data effectively and to aggregate data in an accurate and timely manner may limit our ability to manage current and emerging risks, as well as to manage changing business needs.
Our business may be adversely affected by an increasing prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes.
As a bank, we are susceptible to fraudulent activity, information security breaches and cybersecurity related incidents that may be committed against us or our clients, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of our information or our client information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our clients, litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts. Nationally, reported incidents of fraud and other financial crimes have increased. We are not aware that we have experienced any material misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information as a result of a cyber-security breach or other act,; however, some of our clients may have been affected by these breaches, which could increase their risks of identity theft, credit card fraud and other fraudulent activity that could involve their accounts with us. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent such losses, there can be no assurance that such losses will not occur.
The financial services market is undergoing rapid technological changes, and if we are unable to stay current with those changes, we will not be able to effectively compete.
The financial services market, including banking services, is undergoing rapid changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to keep pace with technological changes and to use technology to satisfy and grow customer demand for our products and services and to create additional efficiencies in our operations. We expect that we will need to make substantial investments in our technology and information systems to compete effectively and to stay current with technological changes. Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements and will be able to invest more heavily in developing and adopting new technologies, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. As a result, our ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Regulatory and Compliance Matters
40
The level of our commercial real estate loan portfolio may subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny.
38
The FDIC, the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have promulgated joint guidance on sound risk management practices for financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Under this guidance, a financial institution that, like us, is actively involved in commercial real estate lending, should perform a risk assessment to identify concentrations. A financial institution may have a concentration in commercial real estate lending if, among other factors, (i) total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100.0% or more of total capital, or (ii) total reported commercial real estate loans (as defined in the guidance) represent 300.0% or more of total capital. The particular focus of the guidance is on exposure to commercial real estate loans that are dependent on the cash flow from the real estate held as collateral and that are likely to be at greater risk to conditions in the commercial real estate market (as opposed to real estate collateral held as a secondary source of repayment or as an abundance of caution). The purpose of the guidance is to guideassist banks in developing risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of rtheir real estate concentrations. The guidance states that management should employ heightened risk management practices, including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing. We have concluAs of December 31, 2024, the Banks aggregate recorded that we have aloan balances for concentrastruction in commercial real estate lending under the foregoing standards because our balance in, land development and land loans were 2.0% of total regulatory capital, while the Banks commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2023 represents more than 300s calculated in accordance with regulatory guidance were 320.2% of total regulatory capital. Owner-occupied commercialAs a real estate totalsult, we have concluded 110.2% of total capital, while non-owner occupiedthat we have a concentration in commercial real estate totals an additional 253.3% of total capitallending under the foregoing standards. While we believe we have implemented policies and procedures with respect to our commercial real estate loan portfolio consistent with this guidance, bank regulators could require us to implement additional policies and procedures consistent with their interpretation of the guidance that may result in additional costs to us.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and regulations that could increase our costs of operations.
The banking industry is extensively regulated. Federal banking regulations are designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance funds and customers, not to benefit a companys shareholders. These regulations may sometimes impose significant limitations on our operations. The significant federal and state banking regulations that affect us are described in this Form 10-K under the heading Item 1. Business Supervision and Regulation. These regulations, along with the currently existing tax, accounting, securities, insurance, privacy and monetary laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations, control the methods by which financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. These laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Any new regulation or legislation, or change in existing regulation or oversight, whether a change in regulatory policy or a change in a regulators interpretation of a law or regulation, could have a material impact on our operations, increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and adversely affect our profitability. For example, changes in consumer privacy laws, such as the recently enacted CCPA and CPRA in California, or any non-compliance with such laws, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. See Item 1. BusinessSupervision and RegulationPrivacy Standards for additional information on the CCPA and the CPRA. Compliance with the CCPA, the CPRA and other state statutes or regulations designed to protect consumer personal data could potentially require us to implement substantive technology infrastructure and process changes. Non-compliance with the CCPA, the CPRA or similar laws and regulations could lead to substantial regulatory imposed fines and penalties, damages from private causes of action and/or reputational harm.
41
Non-compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions and limit our ability to get regulatory approval of acquisitions.
The USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutionthemselves from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasurys Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of clients seeking to open new financial accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions and limit our ability to get regulatory approval of acquisitions. While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance can be given that these policies and procedures will be effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, we would be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions, which may include the denial of regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects
39
of our business plan, including our acquisition plans. Failure to maintainAdditionally, and implement adequate programsy perceived or actual failure to combaprevent money laundering andor terrorist financing cactivities could also have serioussignificantly damage our reputational consequences for us. Any of t. These resultoutcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.
If our enterprise risk management framework is not effective at mitigating risk and loss to us, we could suffer unexpected losses.
Our enterprise risk management framework seeks to achieve an appropriate balance between risk and return, which is critical to optimizing stockhareholder value. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, analyze and control the types of risk to which we are subject. These risks include liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk, and reputational risk, among others. We also maintain a compliance program designed to identify, measure, assess, and report on our adherence to applicable laws, policies and procedures. While we assess and improve these programs on an ongoing basis, there can be no assurance that our risk management or compliance programs, along with other related controls, will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in our business. However, as with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to our risk management strategies as there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified.
Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may materially affect the Companys business and results of operations.
The effects of climate change continue to create an alarming level ofraise significant concern fors about the state of the global environment. As a result, the global business community has increased its political and social awareness surrounding the issue, and However, under the United States has entered into internnew Trump administrational agreements in an attemp, federal policy may shift to reduce global tthe emperatures, such as reentering the Paris Agreement. Further, the U.S. Congress, state legislaturhasis on climate change initiatives and federal and stateenvironmental regulatory agencies continue to propose numerousions. This could initiatives to supplement the global effort to combat climate change. Similar and even more expansive initiatives are expected under the current administratclude scaling back federal participation, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks international agreements, such as the Parisk manag Agreement practices, accountnd reducing for the effects of climate change in stregulatory pressuress testing scenarios and systemic risk ass at the federal level on businessmentes, revisincluding expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based onbanks, to address climate-related factors and encouraging investment by banks in climate-rerisks. Legislative and regulated initiativeory proposals and lending toimed at communities disproportionbating climately impacted by the effects of climate change. change may face greater scrutiny or diminished priority.
The lack of empirical data surrounregarding the creditfinancial and other financialcredit risks posed by climate change renderstill makes it difficult, or even impossible, to predict howits specifically climate change may impact impact on our financial condition and results of operations; h. However, the physical effects of climate change may also directly impact us. Specifically, unpredictable, such as more frequent and more frequentsevere weather disasters may adverse, could directly impaaffect the real property, and/or the value of thus. For instance, such events may damage real property, securing the loans in our portfolios. Additionally, if insurance obtained by or reduce the value of that collateral. If our borrowers' insurance is insufficient to cover anythese losses sustained to the collateral, or or if insurance coverage is otherwise becomes unavailable to our borrowers,, the value of the collateral securing our loans maycould be negatively impaaffected by climate change, natural disasters and related events, which could, potentially impacting our financial condition and results of operations. FurtheMoreover, the effects of cclimate change may negativeadversely impaaffect regional and local economic activity, which could lead to an adverse effect onharming our customers and impact the communities in which we operate. Overall, climateRegardless of change, itses in federal policy, the effects of climate change and the resulting,ir unknown long-term impacts could still have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
42
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry Generally
We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business infrastructure.
We rely on numerous external vendors to provide us with products and services necessary to maintainfor our day-to-day operations. Accordingly, our operations are exposed to risk that theses associated with vendors will not perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements ance under service level agreements. The failure of an external If a vendor fails to perform in accordance with the meet its contracted arrangements under service level agreements because ofual obligations due to changes in the vendorits organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products and services or, strategic focus or f, or any other reason, our operations could be disruptive to our operations, which in turn could have a ed, potentially causing a material negativadverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We also
Furthermore, we could be adversely affected to the extent such an aif a vendor agreement is not renewed by the third-party vend or or is renewed on terms less favorable to us. Additionally, the bank reRegulatory agencies expectalso require financial institutions to be responsiremain accountable for all aspects of our vendors performance, including aspects which theyctivities delegated to third parties. DAdditionally, disruptions or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems that supporting our business and clientustomers, or cyber-attacks or security breaches of the involving networks, systems, or devices that used by our clients useustomers to access our products and services, could result in lead to client attrition, regulatory fines,
40
or penalties or intervention, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional increased compliance costs, aexpenses. Any of whichthese outcomes could materially adnd adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations or financial condition.
Ineffective liquidity management could adversely affect our financial results and condition.
LiMaintaining sufficient liquidity is essential to ofor the operation of our business. We rely on a number of different sources in order to meet our potentialquire sufficient liquidity demands. Our primary sources of liquidity are increases into meet customer loan requests, customer deposit accounts, cash flows from loan maturities/withdrawals, payments andon our securities portfolio. Borrowingdebt obligations also provide us with a source of funds to meet liquidity demands. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loas they come due, and other cash commitments under both normal operating conditions and other sources could have a substantiunpredictable circumstances causing industry or general negative effect on our liquidityfinancial market stress. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities or on terms whichthat are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically, or the financial services industry or economy in generallly. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in the geographic markets in which our loans and depositoperations are concentrated, negative operating res or difficults, or adverse regulatory action against u credit markets. Our abilityccess to borrow coulddeposits may also be impairaffected by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financialthe liquidity needs of our depositors. In particular, a markets or negative viewjority of our liabilities and expectations about re checking accounts and othe prospects for the financial services industry orr liquid deposits, which are payable on deterioration in credit markets. Any decline in available funding in amounts adequate to financemand or upon several days notice, while by comparison, a substantial majority of our activities or on termsssets are loans, which are acceptable coucannot be called or sold adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet our expenses, or fulfill obligationsin the same time frame. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances as necessary, we might not be able to replace such as repaying our borrowings or meeting funds in the future, especially if a large number of our deposit ors seek to withdrawal demand their accounts, anyregardless of which could, in turn, have athe reason. A failure to maintain adequate liquidity could material adlly and adverse ely affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity of this Form 10-K.
Several of our large depositors have relationships with each other, which creates a higher risk that one clients withdrawal of its deposit could lead to a loss of other deposits from clients within the relationship, which, in turn, could force us to fund our business through more expensive and less stable sources.
As of December 31, 20234, our ten largest depositors, none of which include brokered deposits, accounted for $246.0304.5 million in deposits, or approximately 11.53.6% of total deposits. Several of our large depositors are local unions of labor unions or have business, family, or other relationships with each other, which creates a risk that any one clients withdrawal of its deposits could lead to a loss of other deposits from clients within the relationship. At December 31, 20234, $658.341.5 million, or 30.91%, of our total deposits were comprised of deposits from labor unions, representing 71432 different local unions with an average deposit balance per local union of approximately $814770,000. At December 31, 20234, 220 labor unions had aggregate deposits of $10.0 million or more, totaling $399.785.3 million, or 18.71% of our total deposits.
Given our use of these high average balance deposits as a source of funds, the inability to retain these funds could have an adverse effect on our liquidity. In addition, these deposits are primarily demand deposit accounts or short-term deposits and therefore may be more sensitive to changes in interest rates. If we are forced to pay higher rates on these
43
deposits to retain the funds, or if we are unable to retain the funds and are forced to turn to borrowings and other funding sources for our lending and investment activities, the interest expense associated with such borrowings or other funding sources may be higher than the rates we are paying on these deposits, which could adversely affect our net margin and net income. We may also be forced, as a result of any material withdrawal of deposits, to rely more heavily on other;, potentially more expensive and less stable funding sources. Consequently, the occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our growth or future losses may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed, or the cost of that capital may be verexceedingly high.
We are required by federal rregulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. At some pointWe anticipate that our capital resources will satisfy our capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Nonetheless, we may nat some point need to raise additional capital or issue additional debt to to support ourcontinued growth or replenish future lossbe required by our regulators to increase our capital resources. Our ability to raise additional capital or issue additiona, if needed, will debt depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions and governmental activities at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Such borrowings or additional capital, if sought, may not be available to us or, if available, may not be on favorable terms.
Accordingly, we cannot make assurances that we will may not be able to raise additional capital or issue additional debt i, if needed, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital or issue additional debt when needed, our ability to further expand our opoperations could be materially impaired and our financial condition and
41
liquidity could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, any additional capital we obtain may dilute the interests of existing holders of our common stock. Further, if if we are unable to raise additional capital when required by our banking regulators, we may be subject to addditional adverse regulatory action.
Our liquidity is dependent on dividends from the Bank.
The BayCompany is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. A substantial portion of ourBayComs cash flow, including cash flow to pay principal and interest on any debt weit may incur, including the Notes, comes from dividends the BayCompany receives from the Bank. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to the BayCompany. Because our ability to receive dividends or loans from the Bank is restricted, our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders and repurchase our stock may also effectively be restricted. Also, the BayCompanys right to participate in athe distribution of assets upon a subsidiarys liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiarys creditors. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to usBayCom, we may not be able to service any debt we may incur, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
We rely heavily on our management team and could be adversely affected by the unexpected loss of key officers and relationship managers.
We are led by a Our management team withbrings substantial experience in the markets we serve and the financial products that we offer. Our operating strategy focusemphasizes on providing products and services through long-term relationship managers. AccordingConsequently, our success depends in large partrelies heavily on the performance of our key personnel, as well as on and our ability to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified senior and middle management.
Competition for eskilled employees is in the banking industry is intense, and the process of locatidentifying key personnelindividuals with the cnecessary combination of skillsexpertise and attributes required to execute our business plan maycan be a lengthy. We may not be suc processful in retaining our key employees and t. The unexpected loss of services of oone or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business because ofdue to their skills, knowledge of our market and financial products, years of knowledge, industry experience, and long-term client relationships and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. If the services of any of our key personnel should become unavailable for any reason, we may not be able toface challenges in promptly identifying and hire qualified personing suitable replacements on terms acceptable to uerms, which could have an a adverse ely affect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social and governance practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new or additional risks.
44
Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds, and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions, and human rights. Increased ESG -related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements, or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards, could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and our stock price. New government regula
Recent changes in the regulatory landscape under the new Trump administration have moved toward a reductions could also result in emphasis on certain ESG priorities, particularly around climate change and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). This shift is leading to the rollback of regulations that mandate specific disclosures and operational practices in new or more strthese areas. However, some stakeholder groups continue to demand greater transparency and action, resultingent forms of in a complex and potentially conflicting environment for companies. If regulatory enforcement of ESG oversight and expanding mandatory a-related policies becomes less stringent, companies may face reputational risks if their practices are seen as insufficient or inconsistent with broader societal expectations, especially related to DEI and voluenvironmentary reporl stewardship. As a result, navigating, diligence, this evolving regulatory and public opinion land disclosure.
scape may require us to balance compliance with regulatory requirements against maintaining investor, customer, and stakeholder trust.
42